MoviePro.net

We have taken some photos of "I Still Know What You Did Last Summer". They represent actual movie quality.

• One small step back for Horror Movies posted on 30 August 2009

  I enjoyed this film, Jennifer Love Hewitt gives a sexy and appealing performance. However this film is a sorry return to the slasher films of the eighties. Don't get me wrong I love Michael, Jason and Freddy but this fisherman lacks charisma. The first film featured deaths of which were all justified (to a point, except that Max guy) the sequel shows murder for the sake of murder (not that there's anything wrong with that)cleaning ladies, caretakers etc. These people aren't even in his way but they bite it anyway. The ending is ridiculous but kind of entertaining. Kevin Williamson's writing is sorely missed and would be the only thing that could save this franchise from becoming I SORTA KNOW WHAT YA DID FOUR SUMMERS AGO AND BEFORE I KILL YA I'M GONNA GO KILL SOME CLEANING LADIES. It's fun but Scream it ain't.

• This ship is sinking fast posted on 24 August 2009

  A mediocre sequel to a rather gripping original. The ridiculous premise (that any human being can come out swinging after being shot seven times, drowned twice, mutilated, hit by a BMW) is livened up only slightly by a couple of plot twists. Brandy does her best to compensate by being superb in a supporting role--too bad this was the only vehicle she could get. The rest of the cast is pretty pathetic--the only reason this movie probably got green-lighted is the fact teenage boys can be counted on to attend any Jennifer Love Hewitt movie, no matter how silly. Columbia should protect its reputation and Hewitt's by saying NO to any more "Last Summer" sequels.

• Very predictable. posted on 24 August 2009

  Poor Jennifer Love Hewitt, she's still plagued by dreams of the Gorton's Fisherman, and he's
  still mad at her for trying to kill him and losing his hand. Well, in this by the numbers sequel,
  Jennifer and roommate Brandy are whisked away to an island resort after winning a radio
  contest. Once they're there, they quickly find out that it's hurricane season and the correct
  answer to what is the capital of Brazil. Anyway, the Gorton's fisherman shows up and starts
  turning everyone into filets. Everyone except for our plucky heroine JLH, who manages to outwit
  this angry angler at every turn. Of course in movies like this, you always wonder why the
  characters are so dumb. The twist at the end of the film was nothing spectacular, and the
  ending had me laughing. I just hope that we are spared another sequel, in which the angry
  fisherman still knows what happened about three summers ago.

• Gorier than the first posted on 21 August 2009

  I found this movie very watchable despite the bad reviews it received. I also like all the characters. This movie does also have more blood and gore than the first one. But I like it! The soundtrack is also enjoyable. Do not think about its weaknesses. Just enjoy it.

• I STILL DONT KNOW WHY I SAW THIS MOVIE posted on 21 August 2009

  I STILL KNOW WHAT YOU DID LAST SUMMER is not only one of the most horrible movie titles in history, it's an even more vomit-inducing movie. There is not one original element in this movie, from the stupid shock sequences to the stale dialogue to the idiotic gore. Jennifer Love Hewitt is so annoying in this movie. She's like a fly with a 36C cup. And what's more annoying is they focus on her cleavage so much but they don't go any further. Whats a slasher movie without an obligatory breast scene? And Moesha is just as annoying! Why would a best friend sneak in the house in the dark and and hide the closet of her best friend who is completely delusional and disturbed? Sometimes I wished Monica would just run into the movie and kill her and steal Mekhi Phipher back cuz the boy is hers. The victims in this movie are pure cardboard cut-outs. And the Killer is as scary as any senior citizen or fan of a Cocoon movie. How can a killer that's 97 years old and probably wears Depends be a threat? I completely despise the slew of trendy horror movies coming out today. Everyone of them is about 4 teenagers who think they're horror movie experts ( just because they say stupid movie references to Nightmare on Elm Street ) who are trapped in a Scooby Doo Shelby Woo mystery involving a killer who could be one of them but turns out to be some moronic guy who we don't care about who wears a parka or a slicker or stupid looking ghost mask. Why are horror movies becoming after-school specials with killers who don't do anything creative but stab? I STILL DON'T KNOW.

• Again, proof that the revitalized horror genre is doomed. posted on 28 July 2009

  Let's face it, when "Scream" came out a few years ago it rekindled interest in a movie genre nearly dead. Unfortunately the audience who embraced it was not the audience for which it was intended.The audience that bought into that movie wasn't aware of what it was satirizing. They'd heard of "Halloween", but seen it? Probably not. If they had then they wouldn't be screaming in fear every time someone leaps into frame only to be revealed as a roommate or friend.Most of the people who saw "Scream" and will go to see this are unaware that they are receiving their older siblings hand-me-down; a host of abandoned plots and cheap tricks. There is nothing here that wasn't in the horror movies of a decade ago, or even, for that matter, the decades before that. They've been targeted by studio executives, and judging on the reaction of the audience I saw it with, targeted successfully.It will only be a matter of time before these movies outstay their welcome with this generation of younger movie fans.Eight-year-olds beware, you're the next target!

• The Story Hook posted on 25 July 2009

  Spoilers herein.The current evolution of this genre depends on manifold twists at the end. The twists here are pretty high quality as slasher stock goes. They show some cleverness: extra teenagers, extra red herrings, some new information `explaining' the motive, some element of justice which both punishes and justifies further wrath in sequels. All this in a context of repeated, possibly nested dreams with a final ambiguous denouement.Ted's Evaluation -- 1 of 4: You can find something better to do with this part of your life.

• Funny movie! posted on 28 June 2009

  I do have to say that I liked this awful excuse for a horror movie. The gore was pretty good, but I still wanted more during the killings, instead of when the bodies popped up later. Speaking of which, I have never seen a movie where the bodies have been shown being killed, one or two days after they're dead, and then not shown ever again. Stupid. This is a movie for people who have a black sense of humor, and those who have an IQ lower than their shoe size. If you see this stink-bomb expect to laugh at the stupidity of the scared people, and the characters.I have never seen so many recycled scenes in one movie. They reused the washer for scare effect, and they recycled Hewitt's "Come and get me" scene, and I felt I was cheated out of a couple of original minutes. This movie was funnier than most of the other comedies this year, including Dr. Dolittle, which I felt is for the same crowd, stupid people. I was rolling on the floor with this movie, especially the tanning bed scene. Turn it off moron! I cheered for the deaths, and I felt cheated at the end. If he really did kill them, I was cheated out of the deaths that I really wanted to see. Such bad acting should be saved for low-budget flicks, but this may become a high-budget cult flick. I did not believe that anybody in the movie was scared, and I thought that it was all fun and games to these people, except for her fiancee. The first movie's only saving grace was laughing at the scared morons, but for this movie I was able to laugh at the situations and the people. This was a funny movie, and I was laughing so hard I cried. As a comedy, 8 out of 10, as a horror flick, 1 out of ten. And to those who did not like it, see it with a big group, like a sold out show, and have the intention of making fun of it. You'll like the movie much better. Don't forget to cheer for the killer like I did.

• It scares me... that people paid to watch THIS! posted on 19 June 2009

  *I Still Know What You Did Last Summer... I read The SPOILERS* Julie James (Jennifer Love Hewitt, who is as one-expressioned and scenery-chewer in this as she is in 'Ghost Whisperer') has changed college from the first movie, and is still obsessed with The Fisherman (Muse Watson, who has been given way better material in 'Prison Break' and 'NCIS'), who pays her a visit in the Campus' Disco (hey, Fishermen just wanna have fun!). In the meanwhile her Match-Made-In-Heaven Ray (Freddy Prinze Jr., whose status as the best actor of the bunch says much about the other thespians involved) is not going to be with her for whatever reason, and her friend Karla (Brandi Norwood, who is as insipid an actress as she is a singer) wins a trip to Bahamas for four people by answering a question which asked her which was the capital of Brazil (Brazilia) WRONG, and she does not see anything wrong with that, nor does she understand she gave the wrong answer.Karla brings her boyfriend (Mekhi Phifer, who plays basically the same character he will play on 'ER' a few years later, and just as annoyingly), and Julie brings friend Will Benson (Benson - Ben's Son, geddit?) (Matthew Settle, who really did his best in a thankless role), since Ray is unaccounted.But when they get on the island, it's rain season, and as the killer murders... people we don't give a darn about (which could very well mean any character), including a scary rastafarian Mary Jane smoker (Jack Black?), our core four begin to find out they should have paid attention in First Grade Geography Class, and begin to act stupid (if they ever stopped), which leads to the most stupid scary movie I ever had the displeasure to watch, and to a good thing; Mekhi Phifer's and Jennifer Esposito's characters' death.Then the killer gets Julie, and she has the most unbelievable fight ever - Miss Fraily Girl managing to overpower two strong men? Big no no...By the way, why take the characters out to Bahamas to kill them? Why not murdering them on the spot? And why did The Fisherman not kill Ray? One more question: why did Mandalay greenly this script? It has been written by someone who didn't know anything about writing stories, much less screenplays.In short, this movie deserves completely the title it has been given in Italy: 'Incubo Finale' ('Final Nightmare'), because it IS a nightmare of a movie, and to use a pun, it's not a horror movie, but a horror of a movie.The Fisherman is cool, though. I was rooting for him in this movie.I Still Know What You Did Last Summer: 1/10.

• why? posted on 13 June 2009

  The first movie gave this film a perfect setup, but they screwed it up. They turned a solid thriller into a silly slasher pick. The acting was good, but it makes no difference with a script like this. The way the cast gets to the island is enough to make you realize how unintelligent the film is. It starts out good, then heads toward disaster. By the way, what's with all the chest shots of Hewitt? Did they think that would be enough to keep viewers interested? It was another suspenseless film with a nonexistent plot, and a cast that runs around screaming before finally getting killed one by one. The box-office numbers should be enough to tell you that there won't be a third. If somehow they decide to make one, try getting a good script first. The first one is a classic compared to the likes of this junk. 1/4

• This Is A Awesome film 10/10 posted on 13 June 2009

  This is a awesome movie I own it on DVD, Jennifer love hewitt is gorgeous and the acting is good too :) I prefered this one to the first movie I know what you did last summer, gets a 10/10 from me, the ending has really got me thinking , is there going to be a 3rd movie and if so what are they going to call it huh , something like And I still remember what you did last summer :)

• If you still know what they did three summers ago, keep it to yourself. posted on 06 April 2009

  One of the disadvantages of films no longer having all the credits at the beginning is that you now have to wait till the end for clues that the film in question may suck - the appalling film of "The Saint" a few years ago had Leslie Charteris' name nowhere in sight, and similarly "I Still Know What You Did Last Summer" credits neither Kevin Williamson (writer of the first film) nor Lois Duncan (author of the book that it was based on), although they could both lay claim to having originated certain characters. Perhaps they declined to have anything to do with it on seeing the script by Trey Callaway, who also had a hand in the mercifully short-lived ER-in-space TV show "Mercy Point."And I can't blame them if they did - the first film was no classic but I can see why it was a hit (it did have some real jolts, it was less self-referential than other recent fright flicks, and the pairing of Jennifer Love Hewitt and Sarah Michelle Gellar was a gift to guys everywhere, even if SMG did get killed). But this time it's idiocy all the way, from the title (the most inaccurate title for a sequel since "Rambo III") to the climax featuring the world's only six-shooter that fires eight bullets, while Danny Cannon's direction and John Frizzell's score duke it out to see which is the most OTT (the music wins). And the ending may as well have had the words "Julie James will return in 'I Still Know What You Did Three Summers Ago'" splattered across the screen - it would have been more subtle.Jennifer Esposito is good as the bartender in the karaoke bar, though it's hard not to think "She left 'Spin City' for THIS?" - and at least we were spared Brandy singing over the credits (for those of you who leave before the end, Jennifer Love Hewitt does that job). But basically this is a waste of time for fans of good movies, although the delicious Miss Hewitt is as fanciable as ever (which is why I gave this film 2 out of 10 instead of 1).

• Silly slasher fun. posted on 06 January 2009

  Of course, a ridiculously silly movie which is not at all scary. However, it is admirable in its attempt to keep the viewer hooked throughout. It is certainly entertaining, much more than the rather dull original movie. Silly? Very. Stupid? Yes. Fun? Certainly.

• I still think these movies are... you know posted on 29 May 2009

  Remember the time they said on t.v There is a big storm coming brace yourself for this. There is heavy rain , strong gusty winds up to hurricane force ,and high tides headed your way. Hang on tight folks its a big one. You wake up the next morning only to see the sun out shining and then later in the afternoon the rain and winds come but are very light and the rain ends quickly. You say to yourself "What happend!" Here I go spending some money to protect my home and nothing happends. I was better off without doing any protection. I was expecting a much better movie. The scary part came but was too short and dull. */**** stars ,a blow!

• Re: it was okay posted on 26 May 2009

  It wasn't scary or gory enough. but it had its moments. Then again, of course, Jennifer Love Hewitt can redeem any film

• An Entertaining Sequel! posted on 23 May 2009

  Although it fails to exceed the suspense of the original, this sequel was very entertaining. It was stylish, to say the least. As far as production design goes, every scene goes to the extreme by adding little touches that make it look perfect. The HUGE ensemble cast is great, the direction is great, the plot is a little far-fetched but still plausible. What's not to like? Rent (or buy) and enjoy!My Grade: B+Cast: Jennifer Love Hewitt (Julie James), Freddie Prinze Jr. (Ray Bronson), Brandy Norwood (Karla Wilson), Matthew Settle (Will Benson), Mekhi Phifer (Tyrell Martin), Muse Watson (Benjamin Willis), Jennifer Esposito (Nancy Murphy), Bill Cobbs (Estes), Jeffrey Combs (Mr. Brooks), John Hawkes (Dave), and a cameo by Jack Black.

• Predictable, slow. posted on 05 November 2009

  A disappointment. It was predictable, unintelligent and terribly slow movie. It is terribly annoying, I
  could tell every next move. Don't waste time on this one, saw the original again instead.

• Was better the second time around posted on 05 August 2009

  Okay, there are spoilers in here... deal with it.First of, I watched the movie one year ago after taking an exam in college when I had to relax. A few friends originally planned to come along, but they all gave me a rain check about an hour before we went to the cinema. Anyway, I hated the movie. I liked the first one, although it was (after Scream) too much like the 80´s slasher flicks. It had a nice atmosphere and all.The sequel stunk. It was like a generic 80´s slasher movie, no suspense, no nothing. Each kill happened formula-vise: here´s a one minute scare scene where the victim looks around confused, then the fisherman shows up, the victim is petrified and just stands there (without doing something intelligent like running away: The best example is the dock hand: He hangs there and looks up at the fisherman striking him with the hook. Gee, he couldn´t have let himself drop back into the water...). Oh, and I hated it how easily the guys died in this movie. It´s not even baseball: Just one strike and you´re out. Come on, compare it to Scream, people are really GUTTED there before they were finally dead. It may be gory, but at least it´s realistic. I mean, I don´t want gore-fests, I don´t even have to see the blood, but I want to know it´s there. There was a scene were I thought "What the... how could she die from THAT???". I´m talking about the fisherman throwing Brandy into the shelf. Okay, now she is alive in the end, but come on. The fisherman goes through all those troubles to chase her, and when he finally has her he just pushes her into a cupboard and LEAVES?Now, I went to the video store a few days ago, and since all the good DVDs were taken, I rented I still know again. Somehow, it wasn´t as painful the second time around. Now, that may be because I went into it with really high expectations the first time (a friend told me it "was the best slasher movie EVER..." yeah sure). If you watch it as a generic slasher flick, it´s fun. Otherwise, better skip it.

• this is a great film posted on 05 August 2009

  This is an excellent film , Great acting gorgeous jennifer love hewitt, a film not to be missed. the first film was good this one is a lot better, its the good looking teens getting hunted down by a murderer. love it.

• Lacking on plot but enjoyable posted on 05 May 2009

  I Still Know takes place a year after the events of the first film. Julie's college grades are slipping and her relationship with Ray is looking decidedly rocky. When her best friend Karla wins a free trip to a tropical island Julie thinks that maybe her luck is changing for the better but when she and her friends get there they find that The Fisherman is waiting for them and wants revenge. This isn't quite as good as the original and Kevin Williamson's razor sharp writing but thankfully it doesn't lack the razor sharp hook slashing lots of people. Even though it wasn't as plot relient as the original I still found to be very enjoyable especially in comparison to some of the horror sequels out there.